It's got me thinking.
Once again I must push the point, this is not some foolish NIMBY'ism, that I like the design principles. The problem is: The design is for a single 5 bedroomed house behind shuttered gates. The area all around it's proposed site is multi-occupational buildings. Mostly built to house three or four homes in a building. Comfortable but not over large homes, living cheek by jowel with their neighbours. A development of this nature would be completely against the ethos of the area.
Following on from the article on the Swiss Cottage Market, this has had me thinking: "What do we want from our communities? How would we like our local areas to be? In the planned site, I would have no problem seeing some infill if it meant there was a little affordable housing for essential workers but of course developers don't want to build those homes. This type of development would greatly benefit the neighbourhood, where as a highly private super-house would, I feel, only detract from the area.
It won't be long until we have to face some hard questions. Are highly increasing house prices a good thing? Is it right that we can buy several houses? Is it right that the people who work in the essential services have to commute for long distances because those of us with some money have bought the nearby homes? How does a family with combined income of £50K get on the housing ladder in London? Is it right that we can have a home in inner London and a home in the countryside? Where do the people who work in the countryside live when cottages in villages sell for as much as city homes? Is it right to sell off council houses, (right to buy) when there is no more space for building new homes and so many people are financially unable to join the housing ladder and are thus reliant on council provided homes? Is it correct to allow new super-houses when there are not enough average sized homes to go round?
..And this links to a greater issue...
People have bought several houses because they have no faith in the state, (or any other) pension system. What is being done by central government to correct this potentially devastating discrepancy? It's only natural for individuals to plan ahead but the lack of central guidance and forethought on this issue worries me. As I've just written, - planning - housing - pensions - it all interweaves. Without real joined-up thinking from the centre, where are we all headed?


